public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: Khan Muhammad Usman <[email protected]>
To: yudhi s <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-general <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: question on audit columns
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 07:36:31 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR01MB6840804A91ABB765B0A07EACF29C2@DBAPR01MB6840.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
References: <CAEzWdqd=83DQo4SK0sjPhBNAHGCvdcJ3X0OruFLgkL008AM8ug@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPnRvGvHAC8HjLCZ2uUBCRZ7=fMJnkTPd3cBOchJu-Vn7G2MHg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEzWdqfUWE=fuR5k1rd1iQx4K1-LceW3razY8f_tb9YONAZRMQ@mail.gmail.com>
<DBAPR01MB6840804A91ABB765B0A07EACF29C2@DBAPR01MB6840.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
On 9/4/24 06:17, Khan Muhammad Usman wrote:
> Yes this would be the better approach.
1) Except the overhead is now shifted to the application, which may or
not be better. You are also moving the audit responsibility to the
application and the application maintainers and making it application
specific. If a new application/client starts hitting the database and it
did not get the memo about the audit fields they won't be filled in.
2) I would recommend setting up a some realistic tests and see if the
overhead of the update triggers would be a concern.
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
view thread (5+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: question on audit columns
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox