public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: mark bradley <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-general <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Duplicate Key Values
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:12:40 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ2PR22MB4328267BD9F601D90601715BBAD12@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CH3PR22MB4312C23476C0E67F9B4C2E10BACB2@CH3PR22MB4312.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<SJ2PR22MB4328C53DB4397EB9759419DDBACA2@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SJ2PR22MB4328C88FCBA2B447CC72DC90BACA2@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SJ2PR22MB4328931B7CB951A48F1434ABBACA2@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SJ2PR22MB43286857EAC74D1EE332B08CBAD52@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SJ2PR22MB43282F7C60DD81CA90502FA0BAD52@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SJ2PR22MB4328C3D2704FB8F6CD079924BAD12@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SJ2PR22MB4328267BD9F601D90601715BBAD12@SJ2PR22MB4328.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>

On 3/11/25 08:05, mark bradley wrote:
> The rows that were preserved in the nodes table were the ones that were 
> not dups originally.

1) To be specific:

a) If there where two or more rows with a node_id, after the reindexing 
was there only one left?

b) Or for any node_ids that where duplicated did reindexing eliminate 
all rows with that node_id.


2) Per post from Greg Sabino Mullane, you need to show us the steps you 
took to reindex the table.

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Mark Brady
> _amazon.com/author/markjbrady <https://amazon.com/author/markjbrady>_
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 11, 2025 10:56 AM
> *To:* mark bradley <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* pgsql-general <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: Duplicate Key Values
> On 3/11/25 07:28, mark bradley wrote:
>> An "interesting" effect of reindexing is that all the records that were 
>> dups in the nodes table were deleted, both copies.
> 
> I am trying to understand above.
> 
> Was there at least one row of each node_id left?
> 
>> 
>> Also, all rows having node_id as a foreign key in other tables were 
>> deleted, which means all rows in these tables were deleted.
>> 
>> Fortunately these are not huge tables.  I will reenter the data, make a 
>> backup, and then try your further extended suggestions.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Mark Brady
>> _amazon.com/author/markjbrady <https://amazon.com/author/markjbrady 
> <https://amazon.com/author/markjbrady>>_
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adrian Klaver
> [email protected]
> 

-- 
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]







view thread (25+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Duplicate Key Values
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox