Subject: Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
References: 
 <CA+TgmoZYjv9xWub1kbcSWC_RPg3qB_ELNBhQOki1g387JMyoVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABgyVxAO57r=cE0TdMn2XpBDO=d3cj289ep3xQu=8K-tWs79+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <66b61d8b-fe76-d4a9-a983-93a94444a2a6@BlueTreble.com>
 <bf9de63c-b669-4b8c-d33b-4a5ed11cd5d4@2ndquadrant.com>
 <CAEepm=0OtZ9i-G48dAGtdcsvkhUvmZrxn7ODJRkMbdGmPw6nLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEepm=17=83AzSL7yUe4DQXRD4zC9_cN_9sW6yTpCuatmx4xQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6703fdf2-d0e8-54f5-333a-19220d9a716a@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20170127034626.frvkfy66hsq3734v@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <1570c7ca-72e4-7839-29e4-5b30c5d150b4@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20170301063016.o57uv2hxgxysoif4@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <20170405231453.ecqi2t75hxj3vlsb@alap3.anarazel.de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
 Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <cb6d266f-268d-14de-264b-45c962c9d42b@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 14:23:47 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170405231453.ecqi2t75hxj3vlsb@alap3.anarazel.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

On 4/5/17 19:14, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 2017-02-28 22:30:16 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-02-28 23:42:45 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/26/17 22:46, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> On 2016-09-30 15:24:09 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, I have committed a few of the patches now and I'll close the CF
>>>>> entry now.  Thanks for your research.
>>>>
>>>> Are you planning to push more of these at some point?
>>>
>>> Sure, let's take a look.
>> [  partial review ]
> 
> Are you planning to get any of this into v10?  There's one or two
> patches here that could qualify as bugfixes (the GinTernary stuff), but
> the rest doesn't strike me as something that should be committed at the
> tail end of the merge window.

Done.

I'll keep refining the keywords issue based on your feedback.  That
might be something to look into early in PG11.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers