Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJVMe-0005fE-7a for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:06:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJVMd-0004Fb-K7 for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:06:39 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJVMc-0004FU-W8 for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:06:39 +0000 Received: from hogranch.com ([75.101.82.47]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJVMV-0008B3-3w for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:06:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (porker [192.168.0.2]) by hogranch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id uBL16Lv17560 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:06:22 -0800 Subject: Re: How well does PostgreSQL 9.6.1 support unicode? To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org References: From: John R Pierce Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:06:20 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CDC60B114C753477549D46F8" X-HawgScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HawgScanner: Found to be clean X-Pg-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------CDC60B114C753477549D46F8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/20/2016 4:41 PM, James Zhou wrote: > - PostgreSQL 9.6.1 only supports a subset of unicode characters in > BMP. Is there any documents defining which subset is fully supported? I believve its support is based on what the OS native runtime libraries support. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz --------------CDC60B114C753477549D46F8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 12/20/2016 4:41 PM, James Zhou wrote:
- PostgreSQL 9.6.1 only supports a subset of unicode characters in BMP.  Is there any documents defining which subset is fully supported?

I believve its support is based on what the OS native runtime libraries support.


-- 
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
--------------CDC60B114C753477549D46F8--