Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vgQZE-00COyG-0D for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:51:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vgQZD-000duz-0D for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:51:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vgQZC-000dur-0l for pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:51:26 +0000 Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.145]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vgQZ9-000ebn-1X for pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:51:26 +0000 Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32EA1D000E2; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:51:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:51:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aklaver.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1768495880; x=1768582280; bh=KtCLS3MhQh8hhDVxkxoUGMBd+BVUzvIkHEicGhLelyk=; b= bm7mTxxOpvOdE7bL9w89RZi6xKOdc01WlgprnEtTCeMzI1NJTeW/+ZT+MNxAz3uB PawphpV6Yr0SA3HnZ1Gc2XYQX2r+nXG7t5y3tdnwp4/clrYJ9v7eIH31cx31XqjW bGF+haliqS+VvB/oO8Y4o3pTs24WmzfYKQh/2jkzaXh8EQkUv9rznpD7KELOtmhw Sg6/1h/0/veWzCmg3kIEEqjO05ofY8ugqC9t6TLSnoYCia1H5odHVENaBypyWqLZ GAZRE1If8UM5foLask0XHO7+rSYeZoSfrChAsjQaE1mQb4l+hw/HyMhabaqCcmwa 7SyjxiItmuRaf6XWEYWUKQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1768495880; x=1768582280; bh=K tCLS3MhQh8hhDVxkxoUGMBd+BVUzvIkHEicGhLelyk=; b=GD/6AR8olKae7jPm3 DuGpCuVBJOCD3/atDOgOkykX8lHeXjypu00sTy81uTMi/5pQ5AmyQdeglxLO6xzu fewSpu4ad5uvZ8cMjAe+N2VBEeIrBNh8rHM8wMzq2SseEatlgXnkDesMRphFhBi+ 77LCZBPnzWRz/RytDuiPcuXnVqZiH5Gy+KhxHWqzOw98UADpOnD0Uu5nv0u37Gjh xDOktpCgwEiyyLmTBJcvK7ZLrRSjDsc7wbaKmqY8r0GHyE6pQTaZeqieX0gMk7NB 2xnWwiQVZBM0dxkKz7UOz5mKxg00VN0cuMc4cCy54L7Wy0EGVtJZgKThjkT1UxlG euuUQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdduvdeiheekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgoufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmnecujf gurhepkfffgggfuffvfhfhjggtgfesthekredttddvjeenucfhrhhomheptegurhhirghn ucfmlhgrvhgvrhcuoegrughrihgrnhdrkhhlrghvvghrsegrkhhlrghvvghrrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelgffgudegjeeufffgtdffteejffdvheffgeetgedvhfeu ffehffdviefhffffgfenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdhiohenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrughrihgrnhdrkhhlrghv vghrsegrkhhlrghvvghrrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmth hpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmrghilhdvshhonhihvddtuddtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm pdhrtghpthhtohepphhgshhqlhdqghgvnhgvrhgrlhesphhoshhtghhrvghsqhhlrdhorh hg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i76984098:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 11:51:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:51:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: How did VACUUM ANALYZE reclaim large TOAST bloat at disk level in PostgreSQL 16? To: pramod gupta , pgsql-general@postgresql.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Adrian Klaver In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 1/15/26 08:42, pramod gupta wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am encountering the following error while using the *pg_ai_query* > extension. > > /test=# SELECT generate_query('show recent orders', null, 'gemini'); > ERROR:  Query generation failed: No API key available for gemini > provider. Please provide API key as parameter or configure it in > ~/.pg_ai.config. > test=# > test=# SELECT generate_query('show recent orders', null, > 'google_ai_studio'); > ERROR:  Query generation failed: API key required. Pass as parameter or > set OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini API key in ~/.pg_ai.config. > test=#/ > >  have verified all required permissions and confirmed that the > configuration is correctly placed; however, I continue to receive the > above error when using the *pg_ai.config* file. > > If I execute the query by explicitly passing the API key, it works as > expected: > > /select generate_query('I want to count the rows in orders > tables','MYAPIKEY','gemini');/ > > > This works perfectly. I would appreciate guidance on how to configure > this so that the API key does not need to be passed explicitly in the > query. Please let me know if there is any alternative configuration or > recommended approach to achieve this. It is AI it should know the answer. That being said. 1) Did you, in the config file, follow the format here?: https://benodiwal.github.io/pg_ai_query/configuration.html. 2) Is the client you are running the query as in the same location as ~/.pg_ai.config? > > Thanks in advance. > Pramod Gupta > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 9:23 PM pramod gupta > wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > We have a table with a total size of ~628 GB, out of which ~601 GB > was TOAST data. > After running VACUUM ANALYZE on a weekly basis, the table size > reduced significantly to ~109 GB, indicating a large amount of bloat > removal. > > I would like to understand: > > How was VACUUM ANALYZE able to reclaim such a large amount of space, > especially for TOAST data? > > Under what conditions does PostgreSQL reclaim disk space without > requiring VACUUM FULL or CLUSTER? > > Is this behavior expected in PostgreSQL 16, particularly for heavily > updated or deleted TOASTed columns? > > Any insights or documentation references would be greatly appreciated. > > PostgreSQL version: 16 > > Thanks in advance. > Pramod Gupta > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com