public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter J. Holzer <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication)
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 09:23:55 +0200
Message-ID: <r6n3tlkq5cqxqxawrd44qqndy46apijmsxizvbw3baffhqisev@tmlkigxqjd5w> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvozYU11A7T5XxrzajA6-rqrzRZXfbtToAOu+U_S-Btj=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAKAnmmLDfgYRX8oC6S7jKZyovv6wy72Twq6-hx315GKTowMjew@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CANzqJaBq3hcAUXhSi5ar0=Gw0QxqfmD_E47dxHAex9_D3Yv-WA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvo5pLSwD4JVxW8t94Vc88djKrrSyrL-GbQJ=hb2NVT5zg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvq5-7UO1PZBcizg13_ptE0mP=iKwFKUHqhKjwTmS6YR-A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvozYU11A7T5XxrzajA6-rqrzRZXfbtToAOu+U_S-Btj=g@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-10-25 17:50:59 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 at 17:36, Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am not following, from your previous post:
> >
> > "Beta versions are meant for test instances. It'd be
> > good if people encouraged their use more often rather than pushing
> > people to defer til GA"
> >
> > That seems to be the opposite of what you say above.
>
> I think you think that because you misunderstood what I said in [1].
> I'll rephrase it for you:
>
> Because people promote the .0 as not yet production-ready, it means
> that fewer people bother testing with beta and RC versions. Lack of
> beta testing is what causes .0 to contain more bugs than it otherwise
> might, so my suggestion is that we should be encouraging people to run
> beta and RC in their test environments to try to increase the
> stability of .0 versions.
Yes, but in your previous message you wrote:
| I said we shouldn't encourage people to test beta and RC versions,
Note: "shouldn't" instead of "should". Which is exactly the opposite.
I (apparently correctly) assumed that this was a typo, but that wasn't
entirely clear and Adrian obviously took it at face value.
> > > We're talking test servers here.
> >
> > Yes, but the OP was talking about upgrading a production database
> > directly to 18. That was what my reply was referring to and what I was
> > counseling against.
>
> You should pay more attention to the quotes above my reply. I don't
> see any of my replies quoting anything about upgrading a production
> database to 18.0.
Well, You came into this thread replying to Adrian, so maybe you should
have paid more attention to what he was (originally) replying to? Or at
least make it clearer that you are changing the subject? Something like
"I agree in this specific case, but in general ..." is often helpful to
alert people that you aren't commenting on the specific problem they are
currently thinking about.
hjp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | [email protected] | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
Attachments:
[application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, 2-signature.asc)
download
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication)
In-Reply-To: <r6n3tlkq5cqxqxawrd44qqndy46apijmsxizvbw3baffhqisev@tmlkigxqjd5w>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox