Received: from mail.utexas.edu (wb2-a.mail.utexas.edu [128.83.126.136])
	by hub.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA11338
	for <hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Sun, 11 Oct 1998 22:16:37 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from taral@mail.utexas.edu)
Received: (qmail 15891 invoked by uid 0); 12 Oct 1998 02:16:18 -0000
Received: from dial-123-25.ots.utexas.edu (HELO taral) (128.83.221.121)
	by umbs-smtp-2 with SMTP; 12 Oct 1998 02:16:18 -0000
From: "Taral" <taral@mail.utexas.edu>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	"Tom Ivar Helbekkmo" <tih@nhh.no>
Cc: <hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 items
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 21:16:17 -0500
Message-ID: <000401bdf586$4bb02620$3b291f0a@taral>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To: <199810120131.VAA28955@candle.pha.pa.us>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0

> Applied
>
> > I wrote:
> >
> > > As far as I can tell, the only actual error in Paul Vixie's code is
> > > that the two lines you quote above should be:
> > >
> > > 			else if (--size > 0)
> > > 				*++dst = 0, dirty = 0;

[snip]

> > < 			else if (size-- > 0)
> > ---
> > > 			else if (--size > 0)

Didn't we agree this WASN'T the fix for the problem? Something about return
values? I seem to remember that this piece of code needed to be rewritten...

Taral