Received: from comptechnews.com (root@cc993546-b.srst1.fl.home.com [24.3.77.52]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04332 for ; Sun, 21 May 2000 21:08:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from reaster@comptechnews.com) Received: from comptechnews (reaster@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comptechnews.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA22053; Sun, 21 May 2000 21:09:52 -0400 From: "Robert B. Easter" To: Chris Bitmead Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO) Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 21:03:25 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL Development References: <00052110165805.14806@comptechnews> <392895DE.BCF7F2A6@bitmead.com> In-Reply-To: <392895DE.BCF7F2A6@bitmead.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00052121095206.14806@comptechnews> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archive-Number: 200005/406 On Sun, 21 May 2000, Chris Bitmead wrote: > It is from > ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/standards/sql > and dated 1994. Is there something more recent? I believe so! 1994 is an old draft. From what I understand, SQL3 is an official ISO standard as of sometime back in 1999. It may be that the official standard cut out the things you quoted. Try downloading the stuff at: ftp://jerry.ece.umassd.edu/isowg3/x3h2/Standards/ > > > What is the date on the copy of the SQL/Foundation you are reading? My copy is > > dated September 23, 1999 ISO/IEC 9075-2 SQL3_ISO. I tried searching for the > > quotes above and could not find them. Do I have the correct version? -- Robert B. Easter reaster@comptechnews.com