From: "Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us>
To: "'Daniel Gustafsson'" <daniel@yesql.se>,
	"'Robert Haas'" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Sandro Santilli'" <strk@kbt.io>,
	"'Postgres hackers'" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
	"'Mat Arye'" <mat@timescaledb.com>,
	"'Yurii Rashkovskii'" <yrashk@gmail.com>,
	"'Tom Lane'" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	"'Regina Obe'" <r@pcorp.us>
References: <55512.1673304709@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CA+RLCQwWpMuKtqg7eBOjvzpJc-hE708WpHG2=z5B969xncQS3w@mail.gmail.com> <20230409204629.sf4fptx672iehcau@c19> <000501d96c23$0f05bdf0$2d1139d0$@pcorp.us> <20230411184823.s3cctaf63qvfeqlj@c19> <006201d96cb5$3d23b150$b76b13f0$@pcorp.us> <20230411212737.phtzffycglbdhmpx@c19> <002201d96e57$e50461a0$af0d24e0$@pcorp.us> <CADsUR0AfzAcSEL4z4NzjQ2Kp16LXQx=dCc0oVvZuS_C_iNW1nQ@mail.gmail.com> <20230427104957.knkkt3klh5uabzke@c19> <20230531190743.nzktxombkupb25ud@c19> <766065FF-B834-4272-ADE8-559DB06FF9E7@yesql.se> <BF35B13E-0947-400F-8FD5-39647891760D@yesql.se> <CA+TgmoYsrqDQOeD0D=yY72X4QC-3+XPDsXXGrtsuSAE72Uv2gQ@mail.gmail.com> <D1BAF6EF-9CC9-43CD-8FCA-C16DFE4FEC6A@yesql.se>
In-Reply-To: <D1BAF6EF-9CC9-43CD-8FCA-C16DFE4FEC6A@yesql.se>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:59:53 -0400
Message-ID: <002701d9c4b2$bda85a10$38f90e30$@pcorp.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQMCsC7J2od7Oy12wgP6JkSiHl/hwwGfbhARAm8A8U4CpUA3zwGDW9/EAvd7mHsCV9qbiwEpSswwAdWQhrwBJ1YiDwFII/feAgVTBXECroCD5gGr0+ZPAZrcXP2srIghsA==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/002701d9c4b2%24bda85a10%2438f90e30%24%40pcorp.us>
Precedence: bulk

> > On 1 Aug 2023, at 20:45, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:24=E2=80=AFPM Daniel Gustafsson =
<daniel@yesql.se>
> wrote:
> >> returned with feedback.  Please feel free to resubmit to a future =
CF
> >> when there is a new version of the patch.
> >
> > Isn't the real problem here that there's no consensus on what to do?
>=20
> I don't disagree with that, but there is nothing preventing that =
discussion to
> continue here or on other threads.  The fact that consensus is that =
far away
> and no patch that applies exist seems to me to indicate that a new CF =
entry is
> a better option than pushing forward.
>=20
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson

We are still interested. We'll clean up in the next week or so.  Been =
tied up with PostGIS release cycle.

To Robert's point, we are losing faith in coming up with a solution that =
everyone agrees is workable.
What I thought Sandro had so far in his last patch seemed like a good =
compromise to me.
If we get it back to the point of passing the CF Bot, can we continue on =
this thread or are we just wasting our time?

Thanks,
Regina