public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Kumar, Sachin <[email protected]>
To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
To: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Wieck <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Robins Tharakan <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:35:01 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAWbhmgUb8p7ff_ZX5jCvqM=ipPxbbDJTXMNVzH-Ho_CXVkRHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<20220825003227.GA1456581@nathanxps13>
<[email protected]>
<20220908231807.GA2242918@nathanxps13>
<CAAWbhmgUb8p7ff_ZX5jCvqM=ipPxbbDJTXMNVzH-Ho_CXVkRHA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Everyone , I want to continue this thread , I have rebased the patch to latest
master and fixed an issue when pg_restore prints to file.
`
╰─$ pg_restore dump_small.custom --restore-blob-batch-size=2 --file=a
--
-- End BLOB restore batch
--
COMMIT;
`
> On 09/11/2023, 17:05, "Jacob Champion" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> To clarify, I agree that pg_dump should contain the core fix. What I'm
> questioning is the addition of --dump-options to make use of that fix
> from pg_upgrade, since it also lets the user do "exciting" new things
> like --exclude-schema and --include-foreign-data and so on. I don't
> think we should let them do that without a good reason.
Earlier idea was to not expose these options to users and use [1]
--restore-jobs=NUM --jobs parameter passed to pg_restore
--restore-blob-batch-size=NUM number of blobs restored in one xact
But this was later expanded to use --dump-options and --restore-options [2].
With --restore-options user can use --exclude-schema ,
So maybe we can go back to [1]
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a1e200e6-adde-2561-422b-a166ec084e3b%40wi3ck.info
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8d8d3961-8e8b-3dbe-f911-6f418c5fb1d3%40wi3ck.info
Regards
Sachin
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
view thread (5+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox