Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bCTSl-0006JS-JP for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:07:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bCTSl-0003zG-2G for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:07:39 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bCTSj-0003yM-Th for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:07:37 +0000 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bCTSg-00007A-68 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:07:37 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCB020CB1; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:07:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:07:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=FtfPgXLH6K+0T4A oQEApiHvKDAc=; b=TpGiKcgS0tWogrFsXWmgXTMEmMPACEtUdC2t7SPCdOU1PQ8 Wx3rEYpAOZMtT1pRn9gyK5GyOcC+fw7eNFPYkYtGhuN/GxNcAQ/eYQG9kAAAjDqI hZAbcDtC5xhTjMY9ihNLxsgfCuJI/mw1m3UYJAlo7xuUAYColr+XUXnC6gcg= X-Sasl-enc: 1CbbClNeJKic0tBZ5gdAWkGMkU5Yeji0HN2DUtnB+BGw 1465830450 Received: from april.local (c-73-13-66-39.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.13.66.39]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3994BF29FE; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:07:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption To: Ants Aasma , PostgreSQL-development References: From: Peter Eisentraut Organization: 2ndQuadrant Message-ID: <06b6db11-3a3f-4d24-6f57-450f96ecda84@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:07:48 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org On 6/7/16 9:56 AM, Ants Aasma wrote: > Similar things can be achieved with filesystem level encryption. > However this is not always optimal for various reasons. One of the > better reasons is the desire for HSM based encryption in a storage > area network based setup. Could you explain this in more detail? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers