Subject: Re: Psql patch to show access methods info
To: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
 Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>,
 Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20200121223726.GA6714@alvherre.pgsql>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Message-ID: <06e73feb-7ccf-a5ef-0843-79183ea30492@pgmasters.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:33:04 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200121223726.GA6714@alvherre.pgsql>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Alexander,

On 1/21/20 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Jan-21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
>> c) it would be damn handy if \dAf (maybe \dAf+) lists the datatypes that
>>     each opfamily has opclasses for.  Maybe make the output an array, like
>>     {int4,int8,numeric,...}  Something like [*] but somehow make it
>>     prettier?
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to copy-edit my text here: I said "make it prettier",
> but the query I submitted is already pretty enough ISTM; I had written
> that comment when I only had the array_agg() version, but then I changed
> it to string_agg() and that seems to have mostly done the trick.  Maybe
> improve the format_type() bit to omit the quotes, if possible, but that
> doesn't seem a big deal.

The last CF for PG13 has now started.  Do you know when you'll be able 
to supply a new patch to address Álvaro's review?

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net