Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506698F869E for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:08:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from zql.com ([206.222.31.58]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKLFe-0008T6-7d for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:08:16 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by zql.com with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1SKLFO-0006HC-NK; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:07:58 -0400 From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Bug tracker tool we need X-PGP-Key: 2529 DF6A B8F7 9407 E944 45B4 BC9B 9067 1496 4AC8 X-Request-PGP: http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:07:58 -0000 X-Mailer: JoyMail 2.4.0 Message-ID: <072bd4695d133303113fd958c3a187cc@biglumber.com> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/944 X-Sequence-Number: 206747 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > But for any > given ABC there are also people who will tell you that it's got > significant problems. We don't need to change anything to get a > system that's got significant problems; we already have one. Let's not let perfect be the enemy of good. In this case, *anything* that actually tracks bugs (and they are all quite good at that, if nothing else) is an improvement over what we have now, and thus, quite good. :) Personally, I'm okay with, and have extensively hacked on, Bugzilla and RT, but anything should be fine as long as we have someone to take ownership. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204172131 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk+OL/0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshMxACeJdr+WO4ttA2mkrGLv98PTTSH jSoAniKwQNPzokA3f0GYN8gB+hAOc0Hy =oPn6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----