Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lxBnT-0001RK-SX for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lxBnQ-0000T1-Nr for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:44 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lxBnQ-0000St-El for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:44 +0000 Received: from mxout4.routing.net ([2a03:2900:1:a::9]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lxBnN-0000PU-18 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:43 +0000 Received: from mxbox1.masterlogin.de (unknown [192.168.10.88]) by mxout4.routing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E991007E2; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailerdienst.de; s=20200217; t=1624727319; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QaaeAn9NnEksgbPJEO9SoxbAJ7WQoHPZdL1+Ms0YgvY=; b=matkbphkrdWiGFMx68W5zlXpBv8xzvS31KairsYkhXqS5SODB26EcKnJNYVtdSmtnd9whK GHfdy7NNs0o9sSTElsEb52+Z/6vQKPKnpI+keNPhXFpL4xlvY7UTwB03oOlVCDfYlWa8pU g+SCXg7x0fOMB0LcFOAwM1fOt8OLfhE= Received: from remote.index.de (business-90-187-114-221.pool2.vodafone-ip.de [90.187.114.221]) by mxbox1.masterlogin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB27040351; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acedia.index-gruppe.local (192.168.3.121) by acedia.index-gruppe.local (192.168.3.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:08:37 +0200 Received: from acedia.index-gruppe.local ([fe80::85fe:a34b:726c:9304]) by acedia.index-gruppe.local ([fe80::85fe:a34b:726c:9304%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.014; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:08:37 +0200 From: Arne Roland To: Alvaro Herrera CC: Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables Thread-Topic: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables Thread-Index: AQHWxEk1+rora/wutkWbcRQhC03q0KnbGQ2sgAAECBOATmSTgIBhAeKAgBDG6bOAACCNT4AAKOcAgAAj1kP///tHgIAEsSJngAHhzjCAhX9QJP//43kAgAAjD3Q= Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:08:37 +0000 Message-ID: <0f5caffbbfd8442690edc53c612e247d@index.de> References: <7c64cc3c9f1c4c1ca3e1ed5a456d4088@index.de>,<202106261636.6g4befbdrfpn@alvherre.pgsql> In-Reply-To: <202106261636.6g4befbdrfpn@alvherre.pgsql> Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.1.33] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0f5caffbbfd8442690edc53c612e247dindexde_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mail-ID: 3c902d5f-fc79-4107-a1e6-d0a0d8f3d353 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --_000_0f5caffbbfd8442690edc53c612e247dindexde_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Alvaro Herrera Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2021 18:36 Subject: Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables > I'll have a look during the commitfest which starts late next week. Thank you! > (However, I'm fairly sure that it won't be in released versions ... > it'll only be fixed in the version to be released next year, postgres > 15. Things that are clear bug fixes can be applied > in released versions, but this patch probably changes behavior in ways > that are not acceptable in released versions. Sorry about that.) I never expected any backports. Albeit I don't know anyone, who would mind,= I agree with you on that assessment. This is very annoying, but not really= breaking the product. Sure, I was hoping for pg14 initially. But I will survive another year of g= exec. I am grateful you agreed to have a look! Regards Arne --_000_0f5caffbbfd8442690edc53c612e247dindexde_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, = 2021 18:36
Subject: Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables
 
> I'll have a look during the commitfes= t which starts late next week.

Thank you!=

> (However, I'm fairly sure that it won't be in released versions ... > it'll only be fixed in the version to be released next year, postgres<= br> > 15.  Things that are clear bug fixes can be applied
> in released versions, but this patch probably changes behavior in ways=
> that are not acceptable in released versions.  Sorry about that.)=

I never expected any backports. Albeit I don't kn= ow anyone, who would mind, I agree with you on that assessment. This is very annoying, but not really breaking the pro= duct.

Sure, I was hopin= g for pg14 initially. But<= span style=3D"font-size: 12pt;"> I will survive another year of gexec.=
I am grateful you= agreed to have a look!

Regards
Arne

--_000_0f5caffbbfd8442690edc53c612e247dindexde_--