Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1Wa-0007EI-17 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:16:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1WY-0005Je-Ql for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:16:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1WY-0005JT-FQ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:16:22 +0000 Received: from wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.26]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1WQ-0003QU-2c for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:16:20 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6BD2B06ADF; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 04:16:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Mar 2023 04:16:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1677834971; x=1677842171; bh=Qw1rgEdj2zNaP54/52XgMfaedkKPx3DFePY 5N/53cNM=; b=UPTqziY0SXZ/Lxf0JO3TpoDomcfg5Bb4MRACHTqlQmJe78zRsNw Dlnh8lGZa6bxI/Tapu2EDAkF5Tr3Q4tVS0suRdRVdr91r8hd5VHe0dDSY0O0pzu/ ve8cXlkFAnNpTaJQujFG1FqfbHsVCcq/kMsP2kSoqOL2qRxD90qufXxbI2K2KhyA en3eathtU4yCDG9gBvGkbwYKL5R/hJv31Ip7Qy6A0VOyU5AixDzfW9kspga5Z28J 01PTcTc4IqQSZRN5fg+y5JHYOv6T5HxKaa87IjgJLkSCfR68kQVCJXUFe0YP1PJg irhz+pbogyKUwOUDxaGfP1mU032GthFqvGg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudelkedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgv thgvrhcugfhishgvnhhtrhgruhhtuceophgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgruhhtsegvnh htvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheelffeggedujeet iefhleetuddvieffhfffvdejvdffgeejkeduleduheduieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvrhdrvghishgvnhhtrhgr uhhtsegvnhhtvghrphhrihhsvggusgdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i131946ab:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 04:16:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0fff0827-c1f5-d29c-2ee3-dc8c871176bf@enterprisedb.com> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 10:16:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: meson: Non-feature feature options Content-Language: en-US To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz Cc: Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers References: <20230208162310.scllwgr5qp3m5tme@awork3.anarazel.de> <000d58dd-6164-f695-fe12-38ac7e37543b@gmail.com> <1d1eb740-e2d6-dd92-ba35-985af38b30d5@enterprisedb.com> <20230220194249.lkirdwhosjq6zdkc@awork3.anarazel.de> <4e1fcc8d-77cf-082c-5dd8-9ab09bb7a05f@enterprisedb.com> From: Peter Eisentraut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 02.03.23 11:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > I am kind of confused. I added these checks for considering other SSL > implementations in the future, for this reason I have two nested if > checks. The top one is for checking if we need to search an SSL > library and the nested one is for checking if we need to search this > specific SSL library. What do you think? I suppose that depends on how you envision integrating other SSL libraries into this logic. It's not that important right now; if the structure makes sense to you, that's fine. Please send an updated patch with the small changes that have been mentioned.