Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1lOo4H-0007Yg-3S
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:56:01 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1lOo4G-0006vV-1E
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:56:00 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1lOo4F-0006vO-Qj
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:55:59 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1lOo4D-0006PB-NK
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:55:58 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12NKtock1010643;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:55:50 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>
cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>,
        Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
        Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
        Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>,
        Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
        "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
In-reply-to: <872315a8-99fc-da4e-463d-784cfb5a025d@wi3ck.info>
References: <181907.1616253799@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <147fa478-510b-18ef-5323-9c1725b2493c@wi3ck.info>
 <c2a43a97-e551-ea6d-7a4f-a4709b4e0cbd@dunslane.net>
 <5bdcb010-ecdd-c69a-b441-68002fc38483@wi3ck.info>
 <ee7d96b8-7b0e-bb76-9724-900606efe69a@dunslane.net>
 <CALNJ-vSPnudYcS8YowHeq7VAf7PBRyu0vpsbmb_VvTJgguVyHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3886649c-c77d-dfd7-08a4-d1606bc71254@wi3ck.info>
 <91ccdb0d-42fd-7413-4e7c-3d6445655d2e@wi3ck.info>
 <20210323145628.GD579@momjian.us>
 <8d8d3961-8e8b-3dbe-f911-6f418c5fb1d3@wi3ck.info>
 <20210323180646.GG579@momjian.us>
 <91b02dc1-f0d9-e50d-849c-18d9a66484fb@wi3ck.info>
 <985941.1616524546@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <c0f5fde5-5cad-65ed-dd30-cd852301d074@wi3ck.info>
 <986904.1616525964@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <6cccaa33-c263-b8a2-b064-985605d33d25@wi3ck.info>
 <988415.1616528159@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <872315a8-99fc-da4e-463d-784cfb5a025d@wi3ck.info>
Comments: In-reply-to Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>
	message dated "Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:59:48 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1010641.1616532950.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:55:50 -0400
Message-ID: <1010642.1616532950@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1010642.1616532950%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes:
> Have we even reached a consensus yet on that doing it the way, my patch 
> is proposing, is the right way to go? Like that emitting BLOB TOC 
> entries into SECTION_DATA when in binary upgrade mode is a good thing? 
> Or that bunching all the SQL statements for creating the blob, changing 
> the ACL and COMMENT and SECLABEL all in one multi-statement-query is.

Now you're asking for actual review effort, which is a little hard
to come by towards the tail end of the last CF of a cycle.  I'm
interested in this topic, but I can't justify spending much time
on it right now.

			regards, tom lane