From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>,
        Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>,
        pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
        Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>,
        Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?
In-reply-to: <779eb1ce-c8aa-3dda-1830-5ad9a95089b2@enterprisedb.com>
References: 
 <CAAKRu_ZxT9K9FuUCKV6SwZZnC9ExAiELa1oUYyiPk4eGHh12GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230504193006.1b5b9622@karst> <20230508155648.lzddwywo6emote2b@liskov>
 <20230510142419.6185a492@karst>
 <f89c7c65-28f4-82a3-867c-a73e7ab3ccf0@enterprisedb.com>
 <20230516001502.21da48a6@karst>
 <3a18359e-5c78-3039-a0f4-ce1f34559d2e@enterprisedb.com>
 <20230516160051.4267a800@karst> <20230516200052.sbg6z4ghcmsas3wv@liskov>
 <20230517191008.7bee6aa7@karst> <20230517174635.3dsaufqn7y4gbb63@liskov>
 <20230518003529.7b439d00@karst>
 <CAAKRu_buPXM+93id3=yiBW9gCKOAu+DQwU1OHH4tb52jj9-A+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <779eb1ce-c8aa-3dda-1830-5ad9a95089b2@enterprisedb.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
	message dated "Fri, 19 May 2023 17:23:56 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <102633.1684510105.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 11:28:25 -0400
Message-ID: <102634.1684510105@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/102634.1684510105%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I didn't push 0001, I don't think generally do separate pgindent patches
> like this (I only run pgindent on large patches to ensure it doesn't
> cause massive breakage, not separately like this, but YMMV).

It's especially pointless when the main pgindent run for v16 is going
to happen today (as soon as I get done clearing out my other queue
items).

			regards, tom lane