Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F727475CBC; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:13:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from squire.barchord.com (squire.barchord.com [216.194.67.18]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B38447590C; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:13:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.2.86] (nat.inquent.com [216.6.14.45]) by squire.barchord.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D66F6; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:13:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Point in Time Recovery WAS: Hot Backup From: Rod Taylor To: Justin Clift Cc: PostgreSQL-development In-Reply-To: <3DA46FB2.84ECE03E@postgresql.org> References: <4AFE42D73ED1F345A576D3290FF8421C015539@exchange.nnco.net> <1034183509.82072.28.camel@jester> <3DA46FB2.84ECE03E@postgresql.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 09 Oct 2002 14:13:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1034187207.82072.38.camel@jester> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200210/485 X-Sequence-Number: 30254 On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:04, Justin Clift wrote: > Rod Taylor wrote: > > > > > Oh, if thats your problem then use asynchronous replication instead. > > For specific info, the contrib/rserv package does master->slave Thanks. I was having a heck of a time remembering what it was called or even where the DBA found it. -- Rod Taylor