Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for DBD::Pg pg_relcheck problem
From: Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>,
	dbi-dev@perl.org, pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org,
	PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <200212110350.gBB3ob120325@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200212110350.gBB3ob120325@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Copeland Computer Consulting
Message-Id: <1039635882.26706.100.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 11 Dec 2002 13:44:42 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Perhaps compression should be added to the list of protocol changes. 
This way, we can allow for per packet evaluation for compression.


-- 
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
Copeland Computer Consulting


On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 21:50, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net> writes:
> > > Sounds good to me. Is it on the todo-list? (Couldn't see it there).
> > 
> > Probably not; Bruce for some reason has resisted listing protocol change
> > desires as an identifiable TODO category.  There are a couple of threads
> > in the pghackers archives over the last year or so that discuss the
> > different things we want to do, though.  (Improving the error-reporting
> > framework and fixing the COPY protocol are a couple of biggies I can
> > recall offhand.)
> 
> Listing protocol changes seemed too low-level for the TODO list, but I
> have kept the email messages.  Today I updated the TODO list and added a
> section for them.