X-Original-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Received: from spampd.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7587F474E4F for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 02:12:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from apps.tgds.net (unknown [212.100.226.141]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F85474E4F for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 02:12:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (ANantes-106-1-2-106.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.253.229.106]) (authenticated) by apps.tgds.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3F6CAC28788; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 07:12:10 +0100 Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum? From: Tony Grant To: Bruce Momjian Cc: postgres list In-Reply-To: <200304142237.h3EMbvv13720@candle.pha.pa.us> References: <200304142237.h3EMbvv13720@candle.pha.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1050387124.1556.30.camel@vaio> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 15 Apr 2003 08:12:04 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Archive-Number: 200304/863 X-Sequence-Number: 40928 On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 00:37, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Several people have asked if we are losing momentum. Specifically, they > are concerned about Red Hat dropping their Red Hat Database and instead > distributing PostgreSQL as part of Red Hat Enterprise Server, and they > are concerned about recent press articles about MySQL. Just reading GENERAL every day shows quite the contrary! There are more and more questions which really belong on NOVICE. More and more questions about porting applications from MySQL and Access. RedHat renaming "PostgreSQL" to "PostgreSQL" after a short stint a.k.a. "Red Hat Database" is a very positive step. Lots of stupid journalists are starting to write "replace Oracle with MySQL" rubbish. I am very concerned about this because the DBA who is stupid enough to do this will fail miserably and get the wrong impression about free RDBMS. Lets forget the "replace MySQL with PostgreSQL" stuff and go looking for higher end converts. Our marketing push should be "replace Oracle with PostgreSQL and replace Access with MySQL". This puts the emphasis on which database can do what... Just my 2 EURO cents Cheers Tony Grant (yes I use PostgreSQL where MySQL would suffice...) -- www.tgds.net Library management software toolkit, redhat linux on Sony Vaio C1XD, Dreamweaver MX with Tomcat and PostgreSQL