Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.12\))
Subject: Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOYmi+nVsoMRFp4u0oQ66-oPT6+NNAfhLvk5htthY5zkUOnbfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:05:53 +0200
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1050A00D-0076-4E8B-9179-1AEB69863F84@yesql.se>
References: 
 <CAOYmi+nVsoMRFp4u0oQ66-oPT6+NNAfhLvk5htthY5zkUOnbfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1050A00D-0076-4E8B-9179-1AEB69863F84%40yesql.se>
Precedence: bulk

> On 18 Jun 2026, at 22:01, Jacob Champion =
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> For me, the most important reason is OpenSSL, because upstream has
> already reached 4.0 and we still can't drop code written for 1.1.1.

The entire OpenSSL 3.x line will be down to just 3.5 LTS by the time we =
ship
v20.

One complicating factor when it comes to OpenSSL is that we need the =
1.1.1 API
support in order to keep LibreSSL supported.  I have a patch almost done =
for
separating the two such that we can move them independently of each =
other, but
summer vacation and other $life stuff delayed it.  I'll try to get it =
posted
shortly so that we can start the discussion around that.=20

--
Daniel Gustafsson