From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>,
        Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
 vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>,
        Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
        PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
In-reply-to: <CA27C95A-DD8E-4CBD-B840-45CDE1C2B430@yesql.se>
References: <202508051433.ebznuqrxt4b2@alvherre.pgsql>
 <CA27C95A-DD8E-4CBD-B840-45CDE1C2B430@yesql.se>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
	message dated "Tue, 05 Aug 2025 16:41:03 +0200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1060249.1754405941.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 10:59:01 -0400
Message-ID: <1060250.1754405941@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1060250.1754405941%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> Thanks for reviving this.  I am +1 on placing this behind PG_TEST_EXTRA =
as was
> discussed upthread.

+1 here too.

			regards, tom lane