X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F5FD1D17E for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:34:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45956-01 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:33:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from bramble.mmrd.com (unknown [65.217.53.66]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C372FD1C511 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:33:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from thorn.mmrd.com (thorn.mmrd.com [172.25.10.100]) by bramble.mmrd.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i29E6dcM025848; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:06:40 -0500 Received: from gnvex001.mmrd.com (gnvex001.mmrd.com [192.168.3.55]) by thorn.mmrd.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i29EXml10667; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:33:48 -0500 Received: from camel.mmrd.com ([172.25.5.213]) by gnvex001.mmrd.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id FVMAWV50; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:33:46 -0500 Subject: Re: raising the default default_statistics_target From: Robert Treat To: Josh Berkus Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Neil Conway In-Reply-To: <200403081141.06549.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200403081107.12379.josh@agliodbs.com> <14956.1078773588@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200403081141.06549.josh@agliodbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 09 Mar 2004 09:33:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1078842828.22416.335.camel@camel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/318 X-Sequence-Number: 50910 I think the thread you're thinking of is on or about this post: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-12/msg00039.php Manfred Koizar produced a patch that modified index correlation by sorting equal key values based on item pointers. The patch went as far as getting accepted into the patch queue, but Tom raised some doubts about it and it was subsequently removed. Robert Treat On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 14:41, Josh Berkus wrote: > Tom, > > > Are you sure you're not thinking of stats for functional indexes? > > Positive. I even remember seeing that the patch was accepted. > > The patch specifically had to do with a multi-column correlation algorithm for > improving the selectivity of multi-column indexes. > > Problem is, with 1400 posts per month August to October, I can't find it, and > the keywords that I think are obvious don't turn anything up. > > -- > -Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL