X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78EAD1B26C; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:56:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12750-10; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.174]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB98BD1B209; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:56:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from modem-2818.python.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.219.2] helo=[192.168.0.102]) by cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BpCWY-0004De-Sx; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:56:43 +0100 Subject: Re: CVS web interface error From: Simon Riggs To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <20040726150949.D68882@ganymede.hub.org> References: <1090790326.3057.1515.camel@localhost.localdomain> <18928.1090817823@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1090826834.3054.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <26979.1090851081@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20040726123416.U68882@ganymede.hub.org> <1090860054.3054.653.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040726150949.D68882@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: 2nd Quadrant Message-Id: <1090875388.3054.700.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:56:28 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/1267 X-Sequence-Number: 56828 On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 19:10, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:34, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> Working on it ... it was a *really* old version, and from pgfoundry, I > >> imagine it has some issues with the newer CVS ... will post once I have a > >> new one in place that appears to work ... > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > >> > >>> Simon Riggs writes: > >>>> Click "download" and it fails consistently with the error: > >>> > >>> Hm, you're right; I hadn't tried that lately but it does fail for me > >>> too. Weird. I'd not have thought that "download" would make a > >>> different request to CVS than the "revision 1.n" link does ... > >>> but those links still work ... > >>> > >>> I'm betting it's some simple oversight in the cvsweb configuration. > >>> Marc? > >>> > > > > Not too important to me, and I guess I was the only user. > > > > ...only used when need to access code when no laptop, so rarely. > > new one is up, found missing css file for the colors and whatnot ... new > one, I think, is alot nicer then the old ... or, at least, it has some > nifty new features :) > Yes, it works and the new coat of paint looks good too. Thanks. Best Regards, Simon Riggs