Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecEvM-0002S7-1w for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:28:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecEvL-0007OU-LL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:28:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ecEvL-0007OJ-Ea for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:28:27 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ecEvI-0003HV-Jp for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:28:26 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w0IISGV7010981; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:28:16 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Marina Polyakova , "Victor Wagner *EXTERN*" , Andres Freund , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 In-reply-to: References: <0d3a9fa264cebe1cb9966f37b7c06e86@postgrespro.ru> <20180111173938.jimybeayp2u5mmup@alap3.anarazel.de> <31a342fa6a025a8bdfc5b8b19c29d56d@postgrespro.ru> <1232.1515780057@sss.pgh.pa.us> <15299.1515867055@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18209.1516059711@sss.pgh.pa.us> <90ab676392c8f9c84431976147097cf0@postgrespro.ru> <17897.1516202926@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1c70bab595a37ffa3a7fafea29fa6f55@postgrespro.ru> <31743.1516206789@sss.pgh.pa.us> <0e183c12a68af526ebc03c5c26206c44@postgrespro.ru> <16822.1516287408@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5487.1516294381@sss.pgh.pa.us> <99cd20828c6c38c22ff8a08cbd294982@postgrespro.ru> <7326.1516296284@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9189.1516298580@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:24:36 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <10979.1516300096.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:28:16 -0500 Message-ID: <10980.1516300096@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > Anyway, that's really an academic debate. My real point is: I do not > think we should reject out of hand the idea that a patch introducing > some new notation to deal with this might be acceptable. I am not > volunteering to write such a patch, and anyone who tries should be > aware that there is a chance that it will be rejected on grounds of > ugliness. However, if they decide to try anyway, we should read the > patch and see how ugly it really is. Maybe it's not that bad. Sure. I'm not intending to write such a patch either. regards, tom lane