Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkgyh-0002rT-6r for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:44:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkgyf-0000Zn-V9 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:44:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkgyf-0000Zg-OX for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:44:09 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkgyd-00049R-LP for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:44:09 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05F4i2xF1098357; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:44:02 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Masahiko Sawada , Kyotaro Horiguchi , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= , Stephen Frost , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: Read access for pg_monitor to pg_replication_origin_status view In-reply-to: <20200614034540.GB1496@paquier.xyz> References: <20200604.161033.1845732016784727041.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> <20200608.174456.238992210909952383.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> <20200609061104.GD38342@paquier.xyz> <20200609073555.GF38342@paquier.xyz> <20200610033549.GH38342@paquier.xyz> <20200614034540.GB1496@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:46:56 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1098355.1592196242.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:44:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1098356.1592196242@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:35:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> OK, thanks. Then let's wait a couple of days to see if anybody has >> any objections with the removal of the hardcoded superuser check >> for those functions. > Committed the part removing the superuser checks as of cc07264. FWIW, I'd have included a catversion bump in this, to enforce that the modified backend functions are used with matching pg_proc entries. It's not terribly important at this phase of the devel cycle, but still somebody might wonder why the regression tests are failing for them (if they tried to skip an initdb). regards, tom lane