Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2])
	by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA62338
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>;
	Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:57:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA11058;
	Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 13 Sep 1999 13:11:11 -0400 (EDT)
	<199909131711.NAA22947@candle.pha.pa.us>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:56:28 -0400
Message-ID: <11056.937256188@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>        Repair the check for redundant UNIQUE and PRIMARY KEY indices(Tom)
>        Improve it so that it checks for multi-column constraints(Tom)

Those were Thomas, I believe.

>        Fix vacuum's memory consumption(Tom)
>        Reduce the total memory consumption of vacuum(Tom)

And I can't take credit for that either --- Hiroshi and/or Tatsuo get
the credit, IIRC.  (BTW, did we patch those into 6.5.*, or only 6.6?)

>        Update frontend libpq to remove limits on query lengths,
>        error/notice message lengths, and number of fields per tuple(Tom)

This is *not* in 6.5.*, only 6.6.

			regards, tom lane