Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSsod-0002Y1-K0 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:44:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSsoc-0002qc-Fo for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:44:10 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSsoc-0002qV-94 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:44:10 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSsoa-0003UB-8X for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:44:09 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03R1i28S011212; Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:44:02 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: Peter Eisentraut , Bruce Momjian , Alvaro Herrera , Robert Haas , Steven Pousty , Pavel Stehule , Isaac Morland , Pierre Giraud , PostgreSQL Developers Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? In-reply-to: References: <20200423174343.GA16996@alvherre.pgsql> <19233.1587665407@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5561.1587922854@sss.pgh.pa.us> <13e5e408-bc59-e8ca-44f3-28a981b4fc7d@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:23:54 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11210.1587951842.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 21:44:02 -0400 Message-ID: <11211.1587951842@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > Can you try > #docContent p { > - margin-bottom: 1rem !important; > + margin-bottom: 1rem; > } > and see how it looks? In some desultory looking around, I couldn't find anyplace in the existing text that that changes at all. And it does make the revised table markup render the way I want ... so +1. regards, tom lane