Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wNicS-0010jW-34 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2026 02:49:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wNicR-00FvvO-2x for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2026 02:49:43 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wNicR-00FvvG-25 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2026 02:49:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wNicP-00000000gGS-2SvL for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 May 2026 02:49:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 64F2ncuh1142370; Thu, 14 May 2026 22:49:38 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: John Naylor cc: Michael Paquier , Postgres hackers Subject: Re: Re-add recently-removed tests for ltree and intarray In-reply-to: References: <1140010.1778810969@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to John Naylor message dated "Fri, 15 May 2026 09:47:04 +0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1142368.1778813378.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 22:49:38 -0400 Message-ID: <1142369.1778813378@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk John Naylor writes: > FWIW, I tried to reproduce with the former new tests un-reverted, and > didn't see stack overflow on the following, so unless I fat-fingered > that I wonder if there's something more specific on the previously > failing members: > ppc64le / gcc 8.5 / Linux kernel 4.18 > S390X / gcc 13.3 / Linux kernel 6.8 Hm, did you use -O0 ? regards, tom lane