public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Cc: Chao Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fix tuple deformation with virtual generated NOT NULL columns
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:23:00 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvrJBXEhet4=Es_wHBKdv5PCV5OGCaJOSmJexeaFqfmUHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAApHDvoQKY8zHb1LZBuYZBRszi0qVmTaV_zFup=A9xqRpJWMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
<pse3eru75b5skbvc7jjrf7origavqojc6nqtwdrr7z6sjkyxfo@siklvj643v4f>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvogTSD_G1nkJqOvO3gZFACQUCbKg6U7yBB48r5RMaR7-Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAApHDvrJBXEhet4=Es_wHBKdv5PCV5OGCaJOSmJexeaFqfmUHA@mail.gmail.com>
David Rowley <[email protected]> writes:
> I pushed the patch to add the new test after modifying it to also
> include the change in the generated_stored test, but with it commented
> out. This is the method that 83ea6c540 introduced.
The buildfarm is showing clear evidence of a bug here somewhere:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bushmaster&dt=2026-06-17%2021%3A53%3A38
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=taipan&dt=2026-06-17%2018%3A50%3A42
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=canebrake&dt=2026-06-17%2018%3A02%3A59
All three failures look like
diff -U3 /home/bf/bf-build/taipan/HEAD/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/generated_virtual.out /home/bf/bf-build/taipan/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/generated_virtual.out
--- /home/bf/bf-build/taipan/HEAD/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/generated_virtual.out 2026-06-17 07:00:34.298450176 +0200
+++ /home/bf/bf-build/taipan/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/generated_virtual.out 2026-06-17 20:51:26.084674716 +0200
@@ -731,9 +731,9 @@
CREATE TABLE gtest21c (a int NOT NULL, b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) VIRTUAL NOT NULL, c int NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO gtest21c (a, c) VALUES (10, 42);
SELECT a, b, c FROM gtest21c;
- a | b | c
-----+----+----
- 10 | 20 | 42
+ a | b | c
+----+----+---
+ 10 | 20 | 0
(1 row)
DROP TABLE gtest21c;
Speculating wildly, I'm wondering about an uninitialized variable that
happens to usually have the right value.
regards, tom lane
view thread (22+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fix tuple deformation with virtual generated NOT NULL columns
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox