Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D5E9F9BCF for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:05:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58515-02 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:05:19 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (floppy.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC669F9AFA for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:05:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106) id D889131419; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:05:18 +0200 (MET DST) From: Edoardo X-Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers Subject: Re: simple replication Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:05:17 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 19 Message-ID: <1187975117.689377.312330@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <1187959501.883332.6230@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <46CEDCB3.9010300@enterprisedb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com In-Reply-To: <46CEDCB3.9010300@enterprisedb.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20070718 Fedora/2.0.0.5-1.fc7 Firefox/2.0.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.202.128.189; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0 To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/914 X-Sequence-Number: 106836 On Aug 24, 4:27 pm, hei...@enterprisedb.com ("Heikki Linnakangas") wrote: > Edoardo wrote: > > - Google Summer of Code effort by Florian Pflug > > > I would like to talk about the last one: I couldn't find any website / > > explanation or further post. > > The google linkhttp://code.google.com/soc/postgres/appinfo.html?csaid=6545828A8197EBC6 > > is broken > > does anybody knows something about it? > > He's working on allowing you to perform read-only queries on a warm > standby server. Currently, the warm standby can't be used for queries > until you fail over to it. > Even like this is worth considering this solution in my scenario, do you think I can have a look at his work?