Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1guIg1-0006Sx-H8 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:11:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1guIg0-0008N8-9N for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:11:48 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1guIfz-0008Jg-Vu for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:11:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1guIfx-0005jc-Fz for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:11:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1EFBT1S011920; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:11:30 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Gierth cc: Michael Paquier , Peter Eisentraut , Robert Haas , Andreas Karlsson , Andres Freund , Thomas Munro , David Fetter , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs In-reply-to: <1445.1549745572@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <20190111190403.77ye7m5mxypxsf4l@alap3.anarazel.de> <00818be9-2f63-f584-efcd-d97ee0662905@proxel.se> <5715d93e-6ebc-be17-c2c3-56a873100a38@proxel.se> <29576.1548084476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <12408.1548707732@sss.pgh.pa.us> <32184.1548713132@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190129045158.GD3121@paquier.xyz> <17787.1548791564@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4591.1549134061@sss.pgh.pa.us> <87d0o970th.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk> <1445.1549745572@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:52:52 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11918.1550157089.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:11:29 -0500 Message-ID: <11919.1550157089@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet? Can we make a decision? Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax). But we gotta pick something. regards, tom lane