Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oANBn-0007nD-4O for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:00:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oANBl-0008TX-1L for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:00:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oANBk-0008TO-Oj for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:00:52 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oANBe-00083r-7H for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 03:00:51 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 26A30id5119749; Sat, 9 Jul 2022 23:00:44 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Sun, 10 Jul 2022 13:45:23 +1200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <119747.1657422044.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 23:00:44 -0400 Message-ID: <119748.1657422044@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > I wonder how much dead code for ancient operating systems we could now > drop. +1, it seems like this is the cycle for some housecleaning. > * prairiedog, macOS 10.4 (vintage system most likely to cause problems) FWIW, I am expecting to retire prairiedog once the meson stuff drops. macOS 10.4 is incapable of running ninja (for lack of ). While I could keep it working for awhile with the autoconf build system, I'm not sure I see the point. The hardware is still chugging along, but I think it'd be more useful to run up-to-date NetBSD or the like on it. Having said that, I'll be happy to try out this patch series on that platform and see if it burps. regards, tom lane