Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jy2ri-00034x-Pj for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:44:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jy2rg-0002yY-T6 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:44:08 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jy2rg-0002yR-CA for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:44:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jy2rZ-0001rs-SI for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:44:07 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06M0hwbi1239157; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:43:58 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Justin Pryzby , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: v13 planner ERROR: could not determine which collation to use for string comparison In-reply-to: <20200722003612.GC9642@paquier.xyz> References: <20200721191606.GL5748@telsasoft.com> <1199426.1595370300@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20200722003612.GC9642@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:36:12 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1239155.1595378638.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 20:43:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1239156.1595378638@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 06:25:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Ugh. It's clear from your stack trace that neqjoinsel() has forgotten to >> pass through collation to eqjoinsel(). Will fix. > Why didn't you include a regression test in bd0d893? Didn't really see much point. It's not like anybody's likely to take out the collation handling now that it's there. regards, tom lane