Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1waElX-001cuL-2g for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:34:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1waElW-00CAib-2Q for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:34:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1waElW-00CAiT-1Z for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:34:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1waElV-00000000zdM-0R5r for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:34:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 65IFYkTf1242906; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 11:34:46 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: Baji Shaik , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: document standard_conforming_strings dump/restore incompatibility In-reply-to: References: <1131492.1781717349@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:34:41 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1242904.1781796886.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 11:34:46 -0400 Message-ID: <1242905.1781796886@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 01:29:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm inclined to do more or less the attached, which also fixes what >> seems a thinko in the existing text: we should say that clients still >> support standard_conforming_strings =3D off, not >> escape_string_warning =3D off. > I have applied a slightly modified version to master, attached. The git > commit suggested this problem, but I didn't understand the impact at the > time I read it. This didn't correct the point I complained of above: it still says Client applications still support escape_string_warning =3D off for compatibility with old servers. The notion of a client "supporting" escape_string_warning seems quite meaningless. I think this intended to say standard_conforming_strings =3D off. regards, tom lane