Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>,
	Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
	Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>,
	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <200905271351.n4RDpuV12108@momjian.us>
References: <200905271351.n4RDpuV12108@momjian.us>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:51:07 +0100
Message-Id: <1243435867.24860.220.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 09:13 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I think the big frustration is that this issue was first brought up
> > > > March 25 and it took two months to resolve it, at which point we were in
> > > > beta.  I think many hoped a better idea would emerge but often that just
> > > > doesn't happen and we have to do the best fix we can and move on.
> > > 
> > > I agree, very frustrating. Why do you bring it up again now? 
> > 
> > Wny not?  We are not going to improve unless we face our faults.
> 
> Oh, and I am backlogged on email, which is why I didn't mention it a
> week ago when this thread was active (which I think was your point).  :-)

If there is criticism of someone or something, please let's hear it.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support