From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
        Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>,
        pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: ssl tests fail due to TCP port conflict
In-reply-to: <da8b76a3-c59c-49c0-8c30-63a85e8ea646@dunslane.net>
References: <d6ee8761-39d1-0033-1afb-d5a57ee056f2@gmail.com>
 <6756fb60-aa5f-442c-90fb-5f29cd1658f0@dunslane.net>
 <be612e1b-ed89-0391-d3f3-657f27336a55@gmail.com>
 <adbe09a3-7782-4ba8-987b-a8498f469a17@dunslane.net>
 <914151.1717623435@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAGECzQSEOPju_27T8GRnBkZp4RG9KH84boUuMdBq-caaZGDamg@mail.gmail.com>
 <da8b76a3-c59c-49c0-8c30-63a85e8ea646@dunslane.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
	message dated "Fri, 07 Jun 2024 09:55:56 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1244733.1717770345.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 10:25:45 -0400
Message-ID: <1244734.1717770345@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1244734.1717770345%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2024-06-06 Th 18:02, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>> For the PgBouncer test suite we do something similar as the PG its
>> perl tests do, but there we allocate a port between 10200 and 32768:
>> https://github.com/pgbouncer/pgbouncer/blob/master/test/utils.py#L192-L215

> Makes sense to me.

> I still think my patch to force TCP mode for the SSL test makes sense as 
> well.

+1 to both things.  If that doesn't get the failure rate down to an
acceptable level, we can look at the retry idea.

			regards, tom lane