Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2269B63344E for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:57:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69982-04 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:57:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2838F6331B4 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2009 09:57:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2009 12:57:09 -0000 Received: from a91-154-107-53.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.101]) [91.154.107.53] by mail.gmx.net (mp059) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2009 14:57:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/RZuEiCNjRxtLOaWZfZJ30cfmpy0Kql+1TzmNloV B0vp+T+KbBuP3q Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema From: Peter Eisentraut To: Andrew Dunstan Cc: Robert Haas , Sam Mason , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <4A87854B.3070707@dunslane.net> References: <603c8f070908050951s3e5df452se4c610f01b80bb7d@mail.gmail.com> <4A7FE7F902000025000296E3@gw.wicourts.gov> <4A803A89.9020509@dunslane.net> <2CCE9C1D-919D-45D5-BFC2-C7723C45064E@hi-media.com> <162867790908150434j7aef36ecm202e81c4bb4740fa@mail.gmail.com> <4A86B5D5.6060807@dunslane.net> <4A871F46.1040002@agliodbs.com> <5D5ECAE0-F2B0-479B-9594-50AAF18F10ED@hi-media.com> <20090815223102.GS5407@samason.me.uk> <1250378139.18992.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> <603c8f070908152051mbd1d706hb0e29f5cfaf2f151@mail.gmail.com> <4A87854B.3070707@dunslane.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:57:08 +0300 Message-Id: <1250427428.26280.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200908/1220 X-Sequence-Number: 143863 On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > SQL is not Lisp. Simple is good. I didn't think Peter was really very > serious. Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other expressions. So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.