Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibFD9-0006Ha-5c for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 02:43:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibFD7-0004Kl-R1 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 02:43:45 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibFD7-0004Jf-ID for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 02:43:45 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibFD4-00087j-KI for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 02:43:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xB12hZDN012578; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:43:35 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Alvaro Herrera , David Rowley , Amit Langote , Yuzuko Hosoya , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Runtime pruning problem In-reply-to: <20191201015821.GH2355@paquier.xyz> References: <20190912141153.GA31190@alvherre.pgsql> <18820.1568298253@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20191201015821.GH2355@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Sun, 01 Dec 2019 10:58:21 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <12576.1575168215.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:43:35 -0500 Message-ID: <12577.1575168215@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:24:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's on my to-do list, but I'm not sure how soon I'll get to it. > Seems like it is better to mark this CF entry as returned with > feedback then. Fair enough, but I did actually spend some time on the issue today. Just to cross-link this thread to the latest, see https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12424.1575168015%40sss.pgh.pa.us regards, tom lane