From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
    Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>,
    Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>,
    Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
    PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
In-reply-to: 
 <CAB-JLwYSy+oquVkiwubhqs-rHfjvF6p5PRmQHRg4_1vtaL_E7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <202501301529.ejggbtao2skr@alvherre.pgsql>
 <63871.1739984882@localhost>
 <CAB-JLwYSy+oquVkiwubhqs-rHfjvF6p5PRmQHRg4_1vtaL_E7A@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>
   message dated "Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:40:32 -0300."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:48:08 +0100
Message-ID: <127361.1740559688@localhost>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/127361.1740559688%40localhost>
Precedence: bulk

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:

> You mentioned fillfactor only on cluster notes, would be good to mention it
> on refsynopsisdiv, I think.

ok, I've added a note to the first paragraph.

Attached here is the REPACK command as well as the patch set that adds the
CONCURRENTLY option. The new symbols have been renamed so they resemble REPACK
rather than CLUSTER.

Please note that 0008 is a new part which makes the setting wal_leve=logical
unnecessary.

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-diff
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=v08-0001-Add-REPACK-command.patch