Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjoSv-0001Y7-Pq for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:04:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjoSu-0007a8-4t for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:04:00 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjoSt-0007Zr-UK for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:03:59 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjoSr-0005xx-Ic for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 19:03:59 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0AUJ3kl61276942; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:03:46 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Anastasia Lubennikova cc: Justin Pryzby , Stephen Frost , Magnus Hagander , Peter Eisentraut , Heikki Linnakangas , Ian Lawrence Barwick , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove deprecated v8.2 containment operators In-reply-to: References: <20201027032511.GF9241@telsasoft.com> <155ecfd8-7ac6-1875-5090-d79a586a8847@enterprisedb.com> <235561.1605220100@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20201113150343.GT16415@tamriel.snowman.net> <20201116205516.GM14024@telsasoft.com> Comments: In-reply-to Anastasia Lubennikova message dated "Mon, 30 Nov 2020 21:51:12 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1276940.1606763026.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:03:46 -0500 Message-ID: <1276941.1606763026@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Anastasia Lubennikova writes: > Status update for a commitfest entry. > The commitfest is nearing the end and this thread is "Waiting on > Author". As far as I see we don't have a patch here and discussion is a > bit stuck. > So, I am planning to return it with feedback. Any objections? AFAICS, the status is (1) core-code changes are committed; (2) proposed edits to contrib modules need significant rework; (3) there was also a bit of discussion about inventing a mechanism to prod users to update out-of-date extensions. Now, (3) is far outside the scope of this patch, and I do not think it should block finishing (2). We need a new patch for (2), but there's no real doubt as to what it should contain -- Justin just needs to turn the crank. You could either move this to the next CF in state WoA, or close it RWF. But the patch did make progress in this CF, so I'd tend to lean to the former. regards, tom lane