Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTnQw-006LYY-TS for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:29:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTnQu-0076PF-TD for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:29:36 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTnQu-0076P6-BU for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:29:36 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rTnQn-003foa-AM for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:29:34 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 40RITQ3J1287692; Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:29:27 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_K=C5=82eczek?= cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Segmentation fault on FreeBSD with GSSAPI authentication In-reply-to: References: <01704B7E-9948-4926-AD7D-D76C55FCF02A@kleczek.org> <1253020.1706366581@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_K=C5=82eczek?= message dated "Sat, 27 Jan 2024 16:20:26 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1287690.1706380166.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:29:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1287691.1706380166@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_K=C5=82eczek?= writes: > On 27 Jan 2024, at 15:43, Tom Lane wrote: >> Which FreeBSD version? Which krb5 package version? >> Is this x86_64, or something else? > Right, sorry: > 1. X86_64 > 2. FreeBSD 13.2 (It is in a TrueNAS Jail if it makes any difference) > 3. krb5-1.21.2 Hmm. I made a desultory attempt at replicating this, using a fully-updated FreeBSD 13.2 image. I can't find anything wrong, but it's not clear to me that I duplicated your configuration. To make sure we're on the same page: do the tests in src/test/kerberos in our source tree pass on your system? Read the README there for caveats, then do make check PG_TEST_EXTRA=kerberos regards, tom lane