Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179801337B81 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:34:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52487-09 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:34:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412181337B39 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:34:12 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B823348026; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:34:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LTN2fFki6Dq; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:34:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (71-94-248-62.dhcp.mdfd.or.charter.com [71.94.248.62]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BFF2348025; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:34:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Reply-To: jd@commandprompt.com To: Josh Berkus Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com> References: <1295127631.3282.100.camel@ebony> <4D397FE4.2020709@enterprisedb.com> <1295616270.1803.10799.camel@ebony> <4D39A761.1020105@enterprisedb.com> <1295629194.1803.11957.camel@ebony> <14761.1295633002@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1295703074.1803.19835.camel@ebony> <1297096419.1770.5824.camel@ebony> <21347.1297100595@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:33:46 -0800 Message-ID: <1297110826.18411.177.camel@jd-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/504 X-Sequence-Number: 181293 On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 12:24 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > +1. > > I, for one, would vote against extending beta if Sync Rep isn't ready > yet. There's plenty of other "big features" in 9.1, and Sync Rep will > benefit from having additional development time given the number of > major spec points we only cleared up a few weeks ago. > > I think the majority of our users would prefer a 9.1 in May to one that > has Sync Rep and is delivered in September. If they had a choice. > +1 JD -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt