Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTwHq-00011g-8k for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:06:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTwHo-0001BQ-V5 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:06:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTwHo-0001BJ-MZ for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:06:24 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTwHm-0003WH-4s for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:06:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAAN6I4Y012988; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 18:06:18 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: PostgreSQL Hackers , Tomas Vondra Subject: Re: pg_upgrade fails to detect unsupported arrays and ranges In-reply-to: <63DE9A1C-5F59-47AF-90C9-26A7EF9897B3@yesql.se> References: <31473.1573412838@sss.pgh.pa.us> <124042D9-F307-402A-80ED-395C154858BA@yesql.se> <4978.1573420358@sss.pgh.pa.us> <63DE9A1C-5F59-47AF-90C9-26A7EF9897B3@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:39:14 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <12986.1573427177.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 18:06:17 -0500 Message-ID: <12987.1573427177@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: > Applies, builds clean and passes light testing. Thanks for checking! > I can see the appeal of > including it before the wrap, even though I personally would've held off. Nah, I'm not gonna risk it at this stage. I concur with your point that this is an ancient bug, and one that is unlikely to bite many people. I'll push it Wednesday or so. regards, tom lane