Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIDAC-0004NJ-7l for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:46:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIDA9-00021Z-Sb for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:46:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIDA9-00021R-LF for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:46:33 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kID9c-0002tO-Dg; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:46:32 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08FFjvUj1305218; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:45:57 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: Masahiko Sawada , Peter Eisentraut , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft In-reply-to: References: <20200505031600.GB21752@momjian.us> <448a382b-ae07-3126-5a08-aacda9aa28ea@postgresql.org> <63d3f3aa-e42d-dd3d-643c-2e91a13a0762@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:00:50 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1305216.1600184757.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 11:45:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1305217.1600184757@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On a different note, I became aware of this[1] and noticed that dropping > "CREATE EXTENSION ... FROM" was not listed in the incompatibilities > section, so proposing the attached. I have no strong opinions on the > final wording, mainly wanted to get it listed. It is listed already in the "Additional Modules" section (about line 2940 in release-13.sgml as of right now). I don't know Bruce's exact reasoning for not including it in the "Incompatibilities" section, but I tend to agree that it shouldn't be significant to any real-world user. I think that the postgis testing issue you reference is just an ancient test case that they should drop as no longer relevant. regards, tom lane