Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 04:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>
Reply-To: amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>,
	Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
	Alex Ignatov <a.ignatov@postgrespro.ru>,
	Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Message-ID: <1331115387.14768003.1471582423575.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+Tgmoa4FVrCikyOVGVF6HqGZ92CrkBodDnm4SCeC-o2OiHWrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <1873520224.1784572.1465833145330.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <884791796.213185.1466667686999.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <20160623133001.GF21246@momjian.us>
 <1877e60a-a970-18b5-453c-e342f96150e6@postgrespro.ru>
 <CAKFQuwZKtS0Ad=a1E9_mkdYwLMq+JA3YjmhCvjJ1JF+3BU8a0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <d469b177-fd4d-5a5b-769e-620957ec1a64@postgrespro.ru>
 <CAKFQuwb2gp8n2ai_agyJod5BTYxL7ek0AjB9zifDSceK6QntnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoaWTgbtd2RTwVvySMVoOcHmWq66rCCxtVywOOX3FJy4tQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <31915.1466703655@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoaFQZeqmAo3CdivNu70coB=9eM5OroKYtNcTuMaC1kuUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <32684.1466704957@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <734e50cd-c563-4afd-d1c8-80f244b3265e@postgrespro.ru>
 <CAFj8pRDGxe=cdcZ7pur=2WeW9O3MQCZTBEAOJfQ7OLQJaYXDvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <b2a39359-3282-b402-f4a3-057aae500ee7@postgrespro.ru>
 <1285870380.13225431.1471272994354.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CA+TgmoZEWyszzwDGFZ2i1psDgHrdPeZE5Hvs570Q1KfkCfqwgw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d7ffcce8-491f-7969-71a6-73272ad31dfd@postgrespro.ru>
 <60cc3122-0950-e455-21fe-de89882e285d@postgrespro.ru>
 <2095510729.14135736.1471444528728.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CA+Tgmoa4FVrCikyOVGVF6HqGZ92CrkBodDnm4SCeC-o2OiHWrg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in to_timestamp().
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 539
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org


On Friday, August 19, 2016 12:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:35 AM, amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
>
>> Hmm. I haven't really looked into the code, but with applying both patches it looks precisely imitate Oracle's behaviour. Thanks.
>
>
>This is good to hear, but for us to consider applying something like
>this, somebody would need to look into the code pretty deeply.

Sure Robert, Im planning to start initial review until next week at the earliest. Thanks


Regards,
Amul Sul


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers