From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
        Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Subject: Re: Reducing the cycle time for CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS buildfarm
 members
In-reply-to: <b106a38c-6459-e3b5-7d9c-09097de1468b@dunslane.net>
References: <1582507.1624227029@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <467e9f1a-f440-4875-2677-36f52f556f62@dunslane.net>
 <1799344.1624396289@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <3f3f3d9d-fccf-318d-5c16-622778b42645@dunslane.net>
 <693603.1625151671@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <ed2e8c7f-dbfc-29a5-1c89-2dd2bd5075ea@dunslane.net>
 <702694.1625159862@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1289102.1625353189@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <b106a38c-6459-e3b5-7d9c-09097de1468b@dunslane.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
	message dated "Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:49:13 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1334263.1625410490.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 10:54:50 -0400
Message-ID: <1334264.1625410490@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1334264.1625410490%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 7/3/21 6:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I think it's ready to go into the buildfarm, modulo any
>> cosmetic work you might want to do.

> Yeah, I'm looking at it now. A couple of things: I think we should
> probably call the setting 'use_clobber_cache_always' since that's what
> it does. And I think we should probably put in a sanity check to make it
> incompatible with any -DCLOBBER_CACHE_* define in CPPFLAGS.

> Thoughts?

No objections here.

			regards, tom lane