Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1rKuFW-0052Cz-Bx
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:57:06 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1rKuFV-003Jq7-0G
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:57:05 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1rKuFU-003Jpz-Mi
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:57:04 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.94.2)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1rKuFS-00DUF6-Ff
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 05:57:03 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4035uwXX133581;
	Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:56:58 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
        Dagfinn Ilmari =?iso-8859-1?Q?Manns=E5ker?= <ilmari@ilmari.org>,
        Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197@gmail.com>,
        pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Subject: Re: Assorted typo fixes
In-reply-to: <ZZTx7y0gPI9SfCIa@paquier.xyz>
References: <87le9fmi01.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org>
 <CAHv8RjKqCANyFnXbCVoGz-OXVW30HO=KzbSvwmU67tfJTHn48g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87frzgmz8b.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org>
 <CA+Tgmob-0ybwZPMb=AEckTP9wna8Em-nPVW_VXPdqNOLwJs6dQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZZTx7y0gPI9SfCIa@paquier.xyz>
Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
	message dated "Wed, 03 Jan 2024 14:34:39 +0900"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <133579.1704261418.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:56:58 -0500
Message-ID: <133580.1704261418@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/133580.1704261418%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> 0010 is indeed the "correct" plural form for vertex I've known but
> "vertexes" is not wrong either.  Perhaps that's worth changing on
> consistency grounds?

Yeah.  A quick grep shows that we have 16 uses of "vertices" and
only this one of "vertexes".  It's not really wrong, but +1 for
making it match the others.

>     8)</literal>, must be identical.  It doesn't matter which representa=
tion
>     you choose to be the canonical one, so long as two equivalent values=
 with
> -   different formattings are always mapped to the same value with the s=
ame
> +   different formatting are always mapped to the same value with the sa=
me
>     formatting.

> I am not sure about this one in 0011 though..  It also feels like this
> could be reworded completely.

I'd leave this alone, it's not wrong either.  If you want to propose
a complete rewording, do so; but that's not "misspelling" territory.

			regards, tom lane