X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CDD9FB32B for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:15:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42585-09 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:15:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AE19FB25D for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:15:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k83GFRqW013362; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:15:28 -0400 (EDT) To: Alvaro Herrera cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Katsuhiko Okano Subject: Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 In-reply-to: <20060807201014.GB32736@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <200607181650.EDC81237.LOBJUTPuIPPBLLV@oss.ntt.co.jp> <5126.1153241513@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060807114525.5266.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp> <19738.1154956177@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060807185243.GB26021@alvh.no-ip.org> <13175.1154979751@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20060807201014.GB32736@alvh.no-ip.org> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:10:14 -0400" Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 12:15:27 -0400 Message-ID: <13361.1157300127@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.122 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200609/229 X-Sequence-Number: 89758 Alvaro Herrera writes: > OTOH I think we only need to store live Xids and those finished that > wrote a WAL record; we can drop subaborted and subcommitted if they > didn't. While reviewing this thread, I see Alvaro already had the idea I just came to... regards, tom lane