Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5CBAD7E31
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:32:08 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <pgsql@j-davis.com>) id 1SgJKY-0008BG-Pg
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:32:07 +0000
Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8so7307709pbb.19
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
	:content-type:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
	:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=m919SpzSTtt1ep6yy83yNri/FpaOvAd3+qrT4hhQHW4=;
	b=mzJ1pzb4csqHBBBMoW47kMh4URmD24UXhSYOvYXid5lr/LPwGR7Rt9K1wrqmLu8GTc
	HDnsB3o9dsXjQrXTdGY3kUb9U+5vgVUdKDViotsNydlxhgLSgEdVIY2b3XJcHzKOq9nl
	TJl2BjN9/h6boQAj5PEbmdoT26nFeB0Vym2Pu+12pdS7UOMpwRTDKqwcVaJVu3TArT7p
	M+CyJf6PfJfpEfd8nTCIHHnLd0j9p3IhwV+avj+OmBqx2191+SNFo94hzwomE6lq0fng
	g4ZjCX8IJnP7tkJ2K3XA2//r7FXOlPoDQHHP3rqx4bNu8bBw6U8BfAllFSBHiEWuttnG
	S4CA==
Received: by 10.68.239.164 with SMTP id vt4mr42329737pbc.166.1339954312528;
	Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (c-69-181-249-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
	[69.181.249.16])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id oo6sm20847783pbc.22.2012.06.17.10.31.51
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1339954313.19023.7.camel@jdavis>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Misa Simic <misa.simic@gmail.com>, Gabriele Bartolini
	<gabriele.bartolini@2ndquadrant.it>, PostgreSQL-development
	<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Marco Nenciarini
	<marco.nenciarini@2ndquadrant.it>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:31:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+U5nM+O1+rObegvm671_dfz9Tttsi3sBvtuHJaxNLvKz=6U+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <-405928980722608358@unknownmsgid>
	<CA+U5nM+O1+rObegvm671_dfz9Tttsi3sBvtuHJaxNLvKz=6U+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQnfGcxjZE+eoM2xA6TtsDXpEpmBY3u/HXBnwcTImLQxqxVQX7uNZxpWh0IFHL6DSHgyKCSv
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Archive-Number: 201206/848
X-Sequence-Number: 209688

On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 21:10 +0800, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Do we need something like Exclusion FKs? i.e. the FK partner of
> Exclusion Constraints?

Yes, "Inclusion Constraints". I've known we need something like that
since I did Exclusion Constraints, but I haven't gotten further than
that.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis